I have a dear friend who in the kitchen is a pioneer and a scientist and an innovator. On the computer and behind a camera, she's an artist and a wizard. With her child, she's a beacon of humor and patience. She's got the voice of a goddess and isn't afraid to shake her booty. And as a friend, she's just damn good fun. But somewhere early in our association I began to get the feeling that...
dum dum DAAAAAAH...
this friend is a liberal.(Woah there. Let me clearly state that noting all her talents and then calling her a lib was not in fact some sort of literary device for subtly implying that liberals are characteristically talentless boobs. I will leave that sort of smug, implied slander to true assholes like Keith Olberman. Who I would now call a boob, except to do so would insult the boobs of myself and every other woman. Boobs are useful, beautiful things. Olberman's just an elitist ass.)
So your friend's a liberal? Big damn deal, you say. True. Exactly that. One thing I love about her - sure, we have a variety of political beliefs that don't necessarily line up, but either a.) we can talk about them without hating each other, or b.) we respectfully don't talk about them at all. And perhaps that is the difference between "being a liberal" and having liberal beliefs or political leanings. "Being a liberal" is not her defining quality; the end-all-be-all of her being. She's very willing to consider the other side. We have other friends (and family) who are unwilling to even just appear to consider an "opposing" point of view for the sake of ending an argument. They ARE liberals (and conservatives), and very proud of it, but from an outsider's point of view it seems to take away from their quality of life.
My mother always asked us as children to "humor" her. As in, "Mawwwwwwm, I don't want to BE here!" "Well, humor me." Pretend. Put your best face forward. It may be a combination of patience and dishonesty that borders on the unhealthy, but it certainly keeps the peace. And whatever unhealthiness aside, it builds a certain consideration for the feelings of others in s/he who is doing the humoring. Which I believe is called empathy.
Things get heated in the political arena, but despite everything I really try to keep things civil, and at the very least humor those who will accord me the same level of respect. It may be a better use of time to bounce ping pong balls off a wall than to try and relay facts to someone who does not want to hear them. But it's really super fun to actually get out the paddles and have a proper game.
This friend is a great friend, and I hope in her good humoring-humor she'll not mind too terribly that I've not only psychoanalyzed our relationship on a seriously strange political level, but also that I'm reposting what I'd written for her on Facebook in response to an article from the UK's Guardian that she shared regarding the so-called "Ground Zero mosque".
*colored additions denote things not originally posted on FB
*******************************************
I know you've missed me chiming in on things! :-) So here's an alternative viewpoint: http://www.jpost.com/Opini
Since when have we been such champions of religious tolerance and freedom in the US? Everyone's got to tread so lightly because someone might be OFFENDED. Yes, it absolutely is a constitutional right to put it where you please provided all the $ and permits come through. But people are offended. Ooooooh. But unfortunately, that's the precedent that has been set over the past few years. No nativity scene? No holidays? It's not all been just matters of separation of church and state. Upwards of 75% of the people in the US are against the building of this center so close to where the World Trade Center once stood. Simply put: please, No mosque.
As far as being the big olive branch... wouldn't a simple focus group show that this is NOT the best step toward bridging differences between good ol' ignorant Americans and progressive Muslims? If they're really trying to creative positive dialogue, why won't the planners consider any of the alternative options presented by NYC or the state of New York? NY Governor Patterson has offered to meet with the planners and help find them an alternative site for the center, but his offer was met with flat refusal - refusal to even meet. Where's the dialogue there?
As for Ground Zero - the landing gear of one of the planes crashed through the Burlington Coat Factory building, which is part of the reason it's stood vacant for so long. Yeah, it's not the WTC site. But neither is it a residential area that would be best served by a community center with all the trappings of a YMCA. I can't find any website to substantiate this, and the one I'll link to now doesn't help me because I'm unfamiliar with the geography of NYC and Manhattan, but apparently there is already an existing mosque about 6 blocks from the WTC site. The argument that there is little worship space for Muslims living in NYC is silly, considering in the state of Connecticut has fewer mosques (23) than a search of "within 5 miles of Manhattan, NY" (34).
As for the media - aren't they worried about a backlash? The media danced around the Ft. Hood shooting issue claiming they didn't want to create a backlash against regular ol' Muslims. Yet this has been turned into such a "us vs. them" situation that truly moderate middle-American Muslims are being backed into corners and questioned by friends over something they would probably rather have nothing to do with. It's so hypocritical and dangerous on their part. Mosques in CT and NC are being protested as well. Now, provided there is due diligence in researching their funding, no permit issues, and the call to prayer won't drive away any endangered species, should they really be having such a problem? No.
This woman is amazing, and has been around the news for a bit trying to get her point across. http://www.ottawacitizen.c
These are just the philosophical issues... there are more serious issues with the funding and all too. Here, and here, and yeah... here too. Oh and this also. Especially that.
So, a la middle school: In conclusion, I absolutely believe the Cordoba Project planners have every right to build a community center with a mosque in it, or just a mosque, or a freakin' all-beef hotdog stand flying the flag of Hamas near, on, or a few blocks away from Ground Zero... but is the idea in good taste? Is it in the best interest of the people the center will serve? Are the planners according to the non-Muslim citizens of New York the consideration and respect that they demand for themselves?
Nope.